Friday, June 17, 2005

ANDRE: Speculations #1



At this point, Carline and Larry Finck are in jail awaiting sentencing for accusations stemming from the way they defended themselves against a barbaric and highly dubious apprehension order filed by the CAS and signed and authorized by a judge. Mona-Clare is still orphaned as a result.

With as much compassion as we can, as much faith in human goodness as we can still find in us (or is it a NEED to believe in that goodness), intertwined with mercy and grace, and the certainty that truth exists, there is still a need to be have that truth uncovered. No court judgement can completely put an end to the questions we have.

This is not a technical equation, an exaction from law poured like concrete into a court judgement, but it is about complex actors of a human drama. As Shakespearian as can be, the case of Carline Vandenelsen and her children delivers a tale of treason and betrayal, abuse of power and malicious intent, disinformation and scheming, unrighteousness and the condemnation of the wrong person by the law.

Reading and studying King Lear, Othello or Macbeth, we dive in the dark pools of the conflicted human psyche, and find tormented figures, souls for whom the end justifies the means. We find these souls embolden by the success of their deceptive tactics when dishonor cloaks its subjective and abusive rulings over the lives of others, under the guise of political necessity by a third party, unwittingly tied to evil by the necessity of its own societal symbolism.

Justice in our world does not mean righteousness. It means shrewdness in interpreting the law. For good or for bad. But what can we do when things are so, that the cold sword of the judicial system is used to cut the umbilical chord prematurely and without regards for the lives it hurts, nor understanding for the tenderness and vulnerability of human nature.

Hence, here I find myself opening the books to find the chapter that describes the day before the storm... and find an intricate web of speculations which could each lead to a common lair... and to be fair, the following has to be ascertained:

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT WE DISCOVER IF THIS situation has been orchestrated by people from Ontario, if anyone close to Carline and her children involved in past legal battle are behind this, if either one of them placed the call to the CAS five days before Mona-Clare’s birth. IF SO, then we have a totally different case, a totally different story. And the whole country has been played like we was fools.

If it is so, it would now mean that this is a case of conspiracy to destroy the lives of 7 people: Larry, Carline, Mona-Clare and Mona Finck (she died during the standoff of a heart attack), and Peter, Gray and Olivia, Carline’s children now living with her ex husband.

IF IT IS SO, that those people (they know who they are), or anyone else connected to them, has set in motion a series of tragic events by issuing an accusatory statement, which they knew would be taken seriously, not because either parent has ever been found to be unfit, but because they have been involved in high profile cases, then if they did so, he, she or they would have to answer to criminal charges ranging from: conspiracy to use deceit in order to keep Carline and Larry away from Carline’s 3 children; conspiracy to use law enforcement and governmental resources to kidnap a baby and break a family for personal gain; leading to the death of Mona Finck; leading to the use of governmental officers and Emergency Response Unit to further a personal agenda having nothing to do with the best interest of the child which is being apprehended; endangering the lives of the 4 people present at 6161 Shirley Street in Halifax from May 19th to May 21st ; endangering of the whole neighborhood. These are criminal offences: public mischief, and I suspect there could be more charges.

Therefore we also request that a PUBLIC INQUIRY be made, so as to reveal the source of the apprehension order against Mona-Clare Finck. Failure to pursue this avenue would leave our justice system prey to ill intentioned individuals using the law to commit crimes against Canadians, and amount to justifying those crimes against Canadian using the law and the Family Law Privacy Act to hide and protect the perpetrators from accountability. Those who know something should come out and speak.

FURTHERMORE, the true nature of Carline VandenElsen’s acts regarding the absconding of her triplets to Mexico would certainly have to be examined with this new evidence, in this new light, as this would show that indeed there was serious and decisive intent on the part of said parties to deprive the children of any contact with their mother. It would also prove beyond doubt that he has been active in disinformation and character assassination for many years, trying to paint Carline as a criminal and crazy person who represents a danger for her children.

FURTHERMORE, the whole public would have to be reconciled with the fact that they have been played as well in this case, the victims of a diabolical plot to exert a petty vengeance using any means necessary, as they have been swallowing camels and filtering flies. And for those with enough integrity, it would be hoped that they would restore publicly the ones they have attacked publicly.

FURTHERMORE, the children should all be returned to their mother, and Carline's assets returned to her, and damages alloted to her for the years of victimization and irreparable harm she and her children would have suffered at the hand of these confused people.

I am just speculating here. But that’s all the judicial system would leave us with at this point, as long as they do not investigate the case of Mona-Clare Finck in a public manner. But it looks really strange to me, an outsider, that this whole scenario would unfold 4 days before the birth of Mona-Clare, shortly after the children were told by a friend that Carline was expecting a baby girl any day now.

In good conscience, we will keep asking for a public inquiry and a reform of Family Law where it is needed, a law that allows this sort of thing to happen: the apprehension of a unborn child, and the right of Canadian parents to refuse to be mentally assessed by a court-appointed specialist when there is no reason in their mind to do so. They had a birth to prepare for, and a new life to welcome, a family to build and a little girl to educate in the ways of love, community, and in the ways of the world…

Andre

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home